Search for: "Palm v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Zendejas v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
United States, Case No. 22-cv-81294-AMC (S.D.Fla. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Markus's blog where he has a Palm Beach Post story covering the career of the former Dade State and Federal prosecutor. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
 In re Thomas, 79 U.S.P.Q.2d 1021, 1024 (TTAB 2006) (citing Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by David Markus
“Every action that I and my office have taken for the last 23 years that I have been privileged to be in the United States Congress has been based on pursuing the best policies for the people of New Jersey and this entire country. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 2:23 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Similarly, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Compulife Software Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 6:00 pm by Fong & Aquino
In the bad old days, before Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in the 2013 landmark case of US v Windsor, same-sex marriages were not recognized under Federal law. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am by Juan C. Antúnez
 As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am by Juan C. Antúnez
 As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm by Erin Miller
Precisely because Brown has become the crown jewel of the United States Reports, every constitutional theory must claim Brown for itself. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 10:00 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The United States Supreme Court has concluded that “[w]hen an employee communicates to her employer a belief that the employer has engaged in . . . a form of employment discrimination, that communication virtually always constitutes the employee’s opposition to the activity. [read post]