Search for: "Parcell v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 923
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2017, 6:29 pm by Ilya Somin
Rick’s first point is that, if local governments were not allowed to treat contiguous parcels owned by the same person as a single unit for takings purposes, they could try to impose high fees on attempts to subdivide lots, thereby forcing owners to buy a kind of “takings insurance. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
United States, one of the court’s many immigration cases this term. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:59 pm by Bona Law PC
There are, however, two important caveats to this general rule: 1 – In nearly all cases, real property located in the United States in not like-kind to property located outside the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
But the state appeals court disagreed and ruled that the two parcels should be considered as one; if the parcels are viewed together, the siblings were not deprived of all of the value of their land – a requirement for a taking. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:14 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Laroe Estates today seized on the narrowest point of agreement among the parties and the United States as amicus curiae to answer the question in the affirmative and return the case to the lower court to perform the critical analysis, all in a compact eight pages-plus-four-lines. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
  The residential parcel is known as “Lot 9” in the 9-unit residential subdivision known as Hidden Hills. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming, noting that at “issue is not just Lee’s fate, but also the Court’s view of the state of plea bargaining in this country. [read post]