Search for: "Parish v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2011, 5:53 am by Susan Brenner
Under this Directive, `[a]ctions that are taken for the primary purpose of furthering a military . . . function of the United States, regardless of incidental benefits to civilian authorities[ ]’ do not violate the PCA. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Matthew Flinn
In that respect, as was explained in a previous post, the in the recent case of Schalk and Kopf v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights decided that at this point in time, Article 12 does not require States to allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Castillo then asked the Court of Appeal, which looked at cases from the United States Supreme Court (Williams v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
Although this dip eradicated the ticks that were killing cattle across the United States, it was deadly to humans and animals. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
In its table of cases cited, it lists the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As for secular law in the United States, the legal status of the Church varies. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
But while a "diocese" may thus be seen as continuous in the eyes of the Episcopal Church, that entity, as well as the entity that departed the Church, are each still governed by, and subject to, the "First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The Senior Bishop of this Church in Presiding the order of consecration, having jurisdiction within the United States, shall be the Presiding Bishop of the Church. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Americans United for Separation of Church & State (1982) likewise points against standing. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:58 am by Sean Wajert
It was built between 1958 and 1965 by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
  She appealed on the grounds that the offense was an unconstitutional appropriation of powers reserved to the states, but the 3rd Circuit rejected that, finding that the statute was enacted to implement the treaty obligations of the United States under the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention, and therefore fell under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Congress’ powers under the Constitution. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
(That is why analogies between the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of ECUSA are inapt.) [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:56 am by charonqc
More recently he appeared in Bowman v United Kingdom [1998] 26 EHRR 1, in which the European Court of Human Rights declared an electoral law inhibiting campaigns by Catholic pressure groups to be incompatible with the article 10 right to freedom of expression. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:01 am
In Re: New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation, Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana, No. 2001-5104, Div. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]