Search for: "Party X" Results 281 - 300 of 6,702
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2020, 1:52 am by Randall Holbrook
A manufacturer of chemically strengthened glass sold under the IONEX mark failed to show that Apple’s use of the term Ion-X to describe the glass on the Apple Watch was infringing. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 9:24 am by Jonathan Bailey
The judge recently ordered FilmOn X to cease operations in most of the country. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:59 am by Harry Cole
(where FilmOn X, but not Aereo, was the defendant). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:48 pm by Tracy Coenen
Rather than simply taking a spouse’s word for it that his or her income is X, we can do an analysis like this to try to verify the claimed income. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Tracy Coenen
Rather than simply taking a spouse’s word for it that his or her income is X, we can do an analysis like this to try to verify the claimed income. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Tracy Coenen
Rather than simply taking a spouse’s word for it that his or her income is X, we can do an analysis like this to try to verify the claimed income. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 2:36 am
It is a common practice in some industries, particularly shipping and construction, for the contractual relationship between the parties to be composed of several documents. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 1:43 pm
X, section 10, provides:"Neither the credit of the Commonwealth nor of any county, city, town, or regional government shall be directly or indirectly, under any device or pretense whatsoever, granted to or in aid of any person, association, or corporation; nor shall the Commonwealth or any such unit of government subscribe to or become interested in the stock or obligations of any company, association, or corporation for the purpose of aiding in the construction or maintenance of its… [read post]
The post When it Comes to Joint Venture Experience, Perfection May Be Hard to Attain(X) appeared first on Government Contracts Legal Forum. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:44 am by Cyberleagle
(The parties on this application tendered reports by experts on US law, who were agreed that a US court would not enforce any injunction granted in this case to require X Corp to take down the 65 URLs.) [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 7:37 am by Eric Athey
  So, his total earnings in the example above would equate to [50 hours x $10/hour = $500] + [10 x ½ x $11.00] = $555.00. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:31 am
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this birth injury case and its proceedings.) [read post]