Search for: "Pataki" Results 281 - 300 of 412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 12:37 pm
Five months earlier, Pataki defeated Gov. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
Pataki, No. 07-2537 In an action involving whether plaintiffs' complaint sufficiently alleged an eminent domain action underlying a city's building project in violation of the Fifth Amendment, grant of defendants' motion to dismiss is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court overlooked substantial and specific allegations that a private developer was the sole beneficiary of the project; and 2) the public uses invoked by defendants were "pretexts" advanced by… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
Pataki, No. 07-2537 In an action involving whether plaintiffs' complaint sufficiently alleged an eminent domain action underlying a city's building project in violation of the Fifth Amendment, grant of defendants' motion to dismiss is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court overlooked substantial and specific allegations that a private developer was the sole beneficiary of the project; and 2) the public uses invoked by defendants were "pretexts" advanced… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
In an attempt to stop proposed development of downtown Brooklyn through, in part, the use of eminent domain, the plaintiffs in Goldstein v Pataki claimed that the use of that power, which they claimed, was not for a public purpose and hence violated the Public Use clause of the Fifth Amendment.The District Court dismissed the action, and the Second Circuit, based on the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:49 pm
Pataki - Second Circuit - government's claim of public use trump claims of pretext - cert. petition filed March 31, 2008 Brescia - shoreline setback and equitable estoppel - HAWSCT holds you gotta get your "official assurances" from the right party Private agreements and public process - development and settlement agreements not a substitute for zoning process From the afternoon session on Appealing an Administrative Zoning Decision: Hawaii Home Infusion -… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:11 pm
George Pataki and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 5:53 pm
Pataki spent more than $1 million from his political action committees for Broadway theater... [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:52 pm
Pataki - Second Circuit on pleading pretext in Public Use challenges Divine v Town of Nantucket - Massachusetts court invalidates 40 year old taking for lack of proper notice (includes my limerick!) [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:33 am
Pataki, No. 07-2537-cv (Feb. 1, 2008), the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that a property owner failed to state a claim for Kelo "pretext. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
Pataki, No. 07-2537 In case involving eminent domain and a proposed stadium for the New Jersey Nets, dismissal of complaint alleging that eminent domain action violates the Public Use Clause of the Fifth Amendment is affirmed as the plaintiffs have not mounted a viable Fifth Amendment challenge. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 11:45 am
Pataki, a case challenging the condemnation of homes and other... [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Pataki, decided on February 1, 2008: "…eminent domain has its costs, it has its benefits, and in all but the most extreme cases, Supreme Court precedent requires us to leave questions of how to balance the two to the elected representatives of government, notwithstanding the hardships felt by those whose property is slated for condemnation. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Pataki, decided on February 1, 2008: "…eminent domain has its costs, it has its benefits, and in all but the most extreme cases, Supreme Court precedent requires us to leave questions of how to balance the two to the elected representatives of government, notwithstanding the hardships felt by those whose property is slated for condemnation. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 8:02 pm
Pataki, a case challenging the condemnation of homes and other property in Brooklyn for the purpose of... [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 1:33 pm
Pataki, however, a New York federal court dismissed a property owner challenge to a taking because the property owner's complaint did not allege enough facts to show a private benefit (Goldstein was appealed to the Second Circuit where it awaits a ruling). [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 5:10 am
Pataki, charging that the state was ignoring the law by categorically denying them parole. [read post]