Search for: "Payne v. Payne"
Results 281 - 300
of 665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2008, 5:14 pm
In the new "victim impact" cases, Justice John Paul Stevens noted that the Court has not reviewed that type of evidence since its ruling 17 years ago in Payne v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:07 pm
On Wednesday, November 2, Judges Wilkins, Walker, and Rogers heard argument in Payne v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm
In DuPont v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 1:28 pm
Payne v Cooper [1958] 1 QB 74 was a Court of Appeal decision. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 9:13 am
That's been settled law at least since Tennessee v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
In Payne v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:14 am
Fischer n/k/a Payne, New Jersey App. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:06 pm
Payne, 2007 U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 4:57 pm
I really want the time to have a proper look at Payne v Young, but it won’t be for a few days, at least. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:39 am
LEXIS 57185 (SD NY, April 10, 2014), a New York federal district court permitted a Jewish inmate to move ahead with his complaint of denial of Jewish congregate religious services and inadequate hot water and microwave oven for preparation of his kosher food.In Payne v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 11:00 am
Payne, 2013 U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
LEXIS 9132 (MD TN, Jan. 27, 2015), a Tennessee federal district court permitted an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that authorities refused to provide a room for Hanafi Muslims to meet twice a week for study and prayer.In Payne v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 2:15 pm
Payne, 2013 U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:29 pm
Payne, 838 S.W.2d at 237. [read post]
29 May 2016, 1:14 pm
A petition filed by Helmerich & Payne, challenging a different part of the lower court’s ruling, does not fare as well: the federal government recommends that review be denied in Helmerich & Payne International v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:31 am
Graham v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:46 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
16 May 2008, 5:07 am
The defendant's subsequent timely motion to change venue to Queens County, in support of which she submitted the verified complaint, was thus properly heard, and granted, in Queens [*2]County (see CPLR 511[a], [b]; Bergman v Fiel, 12 AD3d 337, 337-338; Figueroa v Mari, 5 AD3d 629, 629-630; Hughes v Nigro, 108 AD2d 722, 723; Payne v Civil Serv. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:11 am
Carter v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm
Some defendants were able to deter RCDI by filing a motion arguing that its patent is invalid under Alice v. [read post]
