Search for: "Payne v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 2:24 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:12 am
Payne, P. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:46 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
” There was no deadline in the warrant for completion of the forensic examination and analysis, “nor [does] the Fourth Amendment provide[] for a specific time limit in which a computer may undergo a government forensic examination after it has been seized pursuant to a search warrant” (United States v Hernandez, 183 F Supp 2d 468, 480; see United States v Syphers, 426 F3d 461, 469, cert denied 547 U.S. 1158, 126 S. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Alexander Payne, Note, Rebuilding the prevent defense: why unethical agents continue to score and what can be done to change the game, 13 VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF ENTERTAINMENT & TECHNOLOGY LAW 657 (2011)David Pepper, Comment, Anand v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:29 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Friday 4 November the matter of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
Payne v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:40 pm
” See Firstline Transportation Security, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:03 pm
Harris v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:34 am
However, the cases of Ferguson v IC(EA/2010/0085) (on which, see my post here) and Brett v IC (EA/2008/0098) imposed an important gloss on that principle. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
Syed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 (07 September 2011) Immigration: Court of Appeal confirms Article 8 ECHR need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
He stated (at paragraph 39) that: "the only principle to be extracted from Payne v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:54 am
Payne v. [read post]
