Search for: "Pb v. Pc"
Results 281 - 300
of 363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2009, 5:23 am
" Here, it cannot be said that the trial court was wrong in determining that there was PC. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 8:24 am
Marranca v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:08 am
Even if the wrong information is excluded, PC remains. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:17 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:11 am
Preston v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:57 am
March 13, 2009).* Controlled buy by the CI within 24 hours was sufficient to show PC. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Burton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:52 am
The search thereafter with a SW issued on that PC was valid. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:42 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:59 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 8:39 am
People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 6:48 am
Shaw v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:52 pm
" State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
The dog's alert gave PC. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 4:59 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 7:35 am
Armon v. [read post]
