Search for: "People in Interest of LJ" Results 281 - 300 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Interestingly, the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court (Fulford LJ and Leggatt J) permitted a McKenzie Friend, Dr Michael Pelling, to make representations on his behalf. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
One situation where that is so is where, applying the words of Brightman LJ in the case of Dyson which were cited in para 30 above, it cannot reasonably be said of the applicant that “if she had not done that deliberate act she would not have become homeless”. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The ICO has fined Smart Home Protection Ltd £90,000 for making nuisance calls to people registered with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS). [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  Meanwhile, the Deputy Minister of Information defended the shutdown and said he would do it again because the people of Zimbabwe are “backward”. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am by Giles Peaker
It is of interest to compare and contrast what is said in the 184 decision and the review decision. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ’s three-year term will run from 1 June 2023. 5RB has more information here. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am by Giles Peaker
It is of interest to compare and contrast what is said in the 184 decision and the review decision. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 11:48 pm by Peter Tillers
Formal theories of uncertainty have a curious and interesting property. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 2:11 am by INFORRM
He added: “I’d give him my views, and if he found them interesting or if he found them useful then I was glad. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
He conceded, however, that in the case of a chancel screen of some intrinsic interest in itself, the act of removing it and re-erecting it elsewhere has some of the characteristics of removing a chattel to another location; and that this made it appropriate to consider, as what he termed “a subsidiary issue”, the extent to which the screen is “part of the heritage and history not only of the church, but also of all the people, present and [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2006] EWCA Civ 1279, at para. 146, per Laws LJ).Thus, to give some examples, the exclusion of all actions in nuisance (a tort) in relation to the noise from Heathrow Airport was accepted by the ECtHR as removing the potential claimants’ ‘civil rights’ (Powell and Rayner v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
  Dingemans LJ and Garnham J held that requests for documents by public inquiries were “bound to lead to the inclusion of some irrelevant material”, but that did not make the request unlawful. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
In a press statement, RMT claims it “falsely portrays our General Secretary Bob Crow as being part of a culture of political immorality and as having caused serious harm to the interests of people in London“. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 101 F.3d 239, 242 (2nd Cir. 1996); Al-Adsani v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 20 June 2019 the Court of Appeal (Males LJ) granted Bloomberg LP permission to appeal in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
  Roy Greenslade has an interesting commentary on the divisions in the coverage. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a similar piece focusing on issues surrounding DNA testing as has the Thomson Reuters Foundation which has noted the increasing trend of people using DNA test kits. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
The Archbishop of Canterbury, the Chief Rabbi and the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster have issued a joint Press Release, reproduced below, which warns of the risk to vulnerable people should Parliament back a new attempt to change the law on assisted suicide. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
The alleged principal (Thames Water) was to have no interest in moneys collected by its alleged agent (Southwark); ii) While calculated by reference to tariffs contained in charges schemes (see clauses 2.3 and 2.3 of the 2000 Agreement), the sums that Southwark had to pay to Thames Water did not correspond to the total of the sums that tenants were required to pay. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sharp LJ refused the application for permission to appeal in the case of Theedom v Nourish Training. [read post]