Search for: "People v Ball"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
(If his crystal ball proves accurate, the drinks are on us!) [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Roberts v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:23 pm
Ball-Co Manufacturing, Inc., 870 F.2d 423 (7th Cir. 1989) (I can't find a free link to the case). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
The April 9th Court of Appeals opinion in A.B. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Yesterday I reported on a courtroom insanity of potentially pathological proportions in Munich (Nokia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:19 am
” The Local adds: This marks the fourth time in history anyone has been prosecuted under Denmark’s blasphemy clause: four people were sentenced for posting posters mocking Jewish teachings in 1938; two people were fined for carrying out a fake baptism at a masked ball in 1946; and two programme leaders at Danish Radio were exonerated in 1971 for airing a song mocking Christianity. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Here Brandsmiths' Andrew Lee pens a guest post on the dissemination of misinformation, or at least over-generalised information, to a wide audience of people who may not realise its true import. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:29 pm
Haag v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 6:27 am
Consider Shavolian v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:15 pm
People who are rabid tend not to compromise. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:15 pm
These general observations have some truth, however, only because people do not stare at computer screens in quite the same way in which they stare at television screens and also because most people do not stare at billboards at all. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:44 pm
The ball is in your court.'Having been told by D.W. to tell her what she had done, Waters did exactly that. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:52 am
However, the Circuit Court decision in People (DPP) v Kelly is relevant. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:18 pm
Maples v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
I was that A/V kid in high-school. [read post]
