Search for: "People v Bull"
Results 281 - 300
of 868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 8:57 pm
The people who can stop it are in Congress. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:14 am
The case, now titled Information and Privacy Commissioner v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
An implementation committee should represent the following interests: • Legal (for issues such as name of product, intellectual property, AML risks, trade practices, advertising clearance, documentation and specific product regulation) • Commercial • Prudential/risk profile • Accounting/actuarial • Software (new, modifications) • Marketing • HR/training Will you seek input from your front line staff,… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
This includes people who own land cultivated under a share-farming agreement, or the personal representatives of a deceased farmer. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 11:17 am
"Cyber-bulling" and other forms of online harassment are a serious problem. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm
Jeff and Sean are part of the HSUS End Dogfighting campaign, an innovative program that relies on community outreach methods to change attitudes and behaviors between people and their pit bulls. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 5:03 pm
It is often the reason that people seek employment in indigent defense work. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
From Motown Record Co., LP v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:44 am
(MCL 500.3135(3)(c); Johnson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 60 [week ending on Sunday 23 August] - Test-drive of the Unitary Patent Court, Parts V and VI |From food porn to porn with food: passion with Parmesan | USPTO Guidelines on patent eligibility | Red Bull fends off Crazy Bull in Greece | Biker Biker Biker Gang! [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:38 am
In Apps v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 10:49 pm
See People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 9:46 am
Pit Bulls, Bull Dogs, and Rottweilers are some of the main dog breeds that people associate with a dangerous capacity to injure people. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:55 pm
Yesterday, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down its decision in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:20 am
FF Cosmetics FL Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:26 am
• Miller v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Human Rights First is committed to recruiting, retaining, and developing staff from a diversity of backgrounds, including members of racial and ethnic minorities, LGBT people, people with disabilities, people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, people of all nationalities, and veterans of the U.S. [read post]
