Search for: "People v Burns" Results 281 - 300 of 1,734
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2021, 1:55 pm by Barton Thompson
We can have people move when their homes burn down rather than just building exactly where the first are going to occur again. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:15 am by SHG
And the same people who screamed constantly about how awful Trump was are now apologists for Biden. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 7:54 am by Steve Lubet
Johnson) or Shawn Eichman (the defendant in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
The victim in this Davie County murder case was a “neighborhood runner,” running errands for people in general, and allegedly running drugs for the defendant. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:25 pm
Bicks eventually did) or -- better yet -- simply learned to live with one's neighbors peacefully.But if you've got money to burn and want to fight, okay. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm by Eric Goldman
In other words, people who try to cloak censorial regulations as pro-free speech are actually trampling on the Constitution. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:11 am
DocName=073000050HCh%2E+V%2E+Art%2E+4%2E5&ActID=1999&ChapterID=55&SeqStart=28100000&SeqEnd=30600000Read More [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm by Brianna Rauenzahn
The Justice Department cited the Supreme Court’s reasoning in FDA v. [read post]