Search for: "People v I. S."
Results 281 - 300
of 39,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
But I'm not exactly sure why we want to stop people from letting their spouses come here. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
(And it's not even shy about it.)The statute requires actual possession to establish guilty, but that's because the Legislature -- and I'm convinced that Justice Humes is correct here -- accidentally left out the word "or" when it amended the statute. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:04 pm
"Whenever I hear of anyone who thinks he's the messiah -- and/or higher up in the organization -- I need to remind myself that it's always possible that he's right. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:48 am
I disagree with this one.It's a total shortie -- seven double-spaced pages. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
Notwithstanding how overworked the Court of Appeal is and how easy it is to just rely on deferential standards of review, it's great to see an appellate court so obviously understand that someone's life is at stake (i.e., here, 80 years in prison) and making sure that the evidence sufficiently supports the conviction.There's lots -- lots -- in here that I agree with. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
On the legal question, I'm not at all certain the Legislature wanted people convicted of inflicting great bodily injury -- a serious offense -- when the victim engaged in voluntary conduct that led to the death. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 12:03 pm
That's basically the rule.It's not that I don't get why people support sex offender registration. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:17 pm
Because it's the lowest form of juvenile humor, even though it was the only opinion published today by the California Court of Appeal, I promised myself I wasn't going to comment about the caption in this case.But then, on page four, I read this line by Justice Aaron: "Ralph saw Goodwillie put something down his pants. . . . [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
But can I really follow, intellectually, what's going on? [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
" So I assume that's him. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
Does the answer change if I make Section 15 the "lesser" offense; e.g., if burning your own house gets you two years in prison but burning other people's houses only gets you one? [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:32 pm
Mensing, 131 S. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 3:36 am
It’s summertime and people need work. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
Indeed, there's not even a body, and the evidence of Christie's death is a lot less than in many no-body cases.) [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:14 pm
I admit that when I read the first dozen or so pages of this death penalty case, it's hard to care at all what happens to the defendant. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
(People v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
People were so upset when I used the word Muslim. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:29 am
No, that's not it.Rather, I was interested in the case because of the facts. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 7:20 pm
People v. [read post]
