Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The difficultly inherent in the case was reflected by the disagreement between the two patent specialist judges who heard the case, Lord Justices Arnold and Floyd. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
That much is clear from the judgment of Lord Jus [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
The consolidated body was chaired by Lord Kitchin (as he now is). [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
They are either the physical or abstract manifestations, signs, animated by the meaning breathed into it the way that "the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
In Thuraissigiam’s case, relevant evidence would have been the record of violence and persecution against people of Tamil ethnicity in Sri Lanka. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Grisworld v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
On 3 June 2020 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2020] UKSC 23. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am
Harm is thus equated with people changing their opinion about a telecommunications project. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am
Harm is thus equated with people changing their opinion about a telecommunications project. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:46 am
Access to legal aid remains limited - https://atjf.org.uk/In the momentous case of Unison v The Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 (the tribunal fees case) Lord Reed explained why this is so important – “Courts exist in order to ensure that the laws made by Parliament, and the common law created by the courts themselves, are applied and enforced. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
On 10 May 2020 the Prime Minister announced a plan for a gradual ease of the lock down and a new phase which will see more businesses reopening and people gradually returning to work. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
This is because the case will be suitable to proceed as a class action if some issues, including common impact, may be resolved for a class of people using common evidence at a common issues trial. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:58 pm
Argument 1 – was the Practice Direction ultra vires (outside the powers of the Master of the Rolls and Lord Chancellor to make). [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
The move comes amid growing U.S. scrutiny of the app, which allows users to create and share short videos of themselves with millions of people worldwide. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:48 pm
Lord Neuberger, the president of the court at the time, explained that the “archive will help people see the background to decisions made” in the court. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
