Search for: "People v Reader"
Results 281 - 300
of 6,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
But yesterday we did manage to release a long episode, Demokratia, that might be of interest to Conspiracy readers. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader and is set out below for the convenience of NYPPL readers. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader and is set out below for the convenience of NYPPL readers. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Specifically, it indicated that 10,000 decisions (page 5) were rendered, “in a timely manner,” (though the reader may note this is not a particularly high number of decisions given the court states it is comprised of over 300 Federally appointed Judges, meaning each is churning out a decision or so every couple of weeks). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
First, an apology for the title. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
The impact of the Blind SA Constitutional Court judgment on amendments Readers would recall that South Africa’s Constitutional Court had in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & Others unanimously declared that the Copyright Act was unconstitutional to the extent that it limited the rights of people with visual and print disabilities. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:41 pm
There's an FTC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
People must feel – and actually be – safe while accessing health care, but the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
ProPublica could fully inform readers about the relevant rule change. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
(See, e.g., Hale, pp. 478-84) Guido, on the other hand, is skeptical of what he calls “paternalism,” and for the most part ascribes to the theory that people “know what is best for themselves. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am
[Based on a keynote address to the conference on Contemporary Social and Legal Issues in a Social Media Age held at Keele University on 14 June 2023.] [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Here's what he says:"Doe entered the women’s restroom, which has two stalls, a small one and a larger one for people with disabilities. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Fortunately, Fritz writes in a sufficiently accessible manner that it can and should be read by any general reader trying to understand the complexities of our sometimes Byzantine political system. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Pott v. [read post]
