Search for: "People v Word"
Results 281 - 300
of 17,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1615, 1619 (2021) (Sotomayor, J.); Barton v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:20 pm
Don’t get me wrong: It is a tremendous victory for the court to say that the plain words of the law protect LGBTQ people, just like everyone else. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
The deprecatory words we use in our opinions are purely ceremonial. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:59 pm
Yes, people can lie. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 5:15 am
In other words, it did not take much to get past a motion to dismiss. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:49 pm
You can ask some people for tickets and not others. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:54 pm
Maj Belliss started out with an analogy regarding the different meanings of football to different cultures, arguing that the specific words mean different things to individual subsets of people. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
Those are the words of Justice David Souter, writing for the four dissenters in The Supreme Court's decision Thursday in Bowles v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:24 pm
Parker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:03 pm
— OPINION — The United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 12:17 pm
Another recent reminder of the perils of putting stuff in emails came from the Viacom v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Despite evidence that the post had only been viewed by a small number of people and was shortly removed from the site, the Court held that the words complained of constituted a “serious libel and was not one to be construed as some mere tongue in cheek saloon bar banter” as was submitted by the defendant. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 12:05 am
People need to be careful of their words, lest they end up eating those words. [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:32 pm
Sod Farms v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:51 am
In other words, that the First District's holding is easily circumvented as long as you have a police officer -- the same officer who admittedly stopped the defendant in a pretextual search -- testify that, yeah, in his view, the stop was legitimate.I don't find that argument persuasive. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
The prospect of carrying out a threat in 10 months is not consistent with the plain meaning of the word “immediate. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 10:04 am
The jury convicted on all counts, apparently believing the prosecution's witnesses over the defendant's.The Appellate Division of the Alameda Superior Court reverses, holding that the jury must have been expressly told that "approach" doesn't include standing still, and that saying that the word has its ordinary meaning doesn't qualify.Whatcha think? [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:14 am
During several instances at the hospital, Contreras was seen talking to unseen others and laughing inappropriately.Some of Contreras's inappropriate behaviors that contributed to Mohapatra's diagnosis were laughter when someone talked about a family member being killed, pronouncing 'guns can solve problems that words cannot,' and threatening his roommate. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:47 pm
Something to which I can personally attest, having been held up at gunpoint myself in that fine locale (albeit not at a fast food joint).As far as I -- or anyone else -- can tell, Gilbert Vasquez and his fellow gang members killed Juan Lopez, without word or provocation, solely because they mistakenly thought he was a member of another gang. [read post]
