Search for: "People v. Brain"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 5:53 am
In Hendrickson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
In the specific instance, there will be a day when marijuana is removed from Schedule I, which has long been acknowledged by pretty much anyone with half a brain as an absurdity, and this problem disappears. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:34 am
However, he determined that McIntosh's PTSD was not compensable because her PTSD was not "the natural or unavoidable result" of her minor physical injury under section 440.093(2).McIntosh appealed and the 1st DCA reversed the JCC.Citing McKenzie v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:21 pm
Part of your reptile brain equates expensive things with quality (i.e., if it costs a lot, it must be good). [read post]
26 May 2009, 9:44 am
If we are publishing changes in our thinking on the subject of canine brains, isn’t it a certainty that we need to revamp our thinking on the human brain? [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 4:04 am
*In the retroactivity opinion of Montgomery v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
Belowyianis v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:49 am
This led to the brain damage. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
(Hill v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 2:35 pm
Related Web Resources: Papadopoulos v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:44 pm
That sort of stuff should gross you out, not turn you on.But if for some reason your brain is erroneously wired, resist the temptation. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:11 am
See Washington v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 1:31 pm
Although coercion in the first degree (Penal Law, § 135.65(1)) and coercion in the second degree by threat instilling in the victim a fear of physical injury (Penal Law, § 135.60(1)) are defined in almost identical terms, there is a guideline differentiating such coercion in the first degree and such coercion in the second degree (People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:15 pm
(Of course, this is all easier with a recorded interrogation.)For a great example of the defense analysis and use of this information in a case in which the defendant, who had an IQ of 68, was convicted of numerous sex offenses, you must read the Fourth Department's decision in People v Knapp (2014 NY Slip Op 07801 [4th Dept 11/14/14{). [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
In that case, captioned TransCare Maryland, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
Baugh v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:26 am
Earlier this summer, a New Brunswick Court, in Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
