Search for: "People v. Fears" Results 281 - 300 of 6,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Ostensibly she could have argued that since her post was only viewable by a limited group of people, the employer’s fears of disruption were unwarranted. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:24 pm by familoo
Well yes, but this should be happening anyway (see K v K wherein the Court of Appeal said ‘Woah, woah, woah – that’s not quite what we meant in H-N. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 5:47 am
This was the first time in history that a government promised its people that they did not need to fear that their own government would seize their persons, despoil their homes, or steal their property. [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
The current treatment of undocumented immigrant workers in Washington reflects a familiar sense of entitlement, fear, and resentment and drives the force that links the state’s mistreatment of Native people, the Japanese, and Latinos. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the Associated Press, Mark Sherman reports that the recurrent frenzy of speculation among court-watchers about the possible retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy “reflects the darkest fears and fondest wishes of people who care about the court on both sides of the political spectrum. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am by Orin Kerr
Steeves, 525 F.2d 33, 38 (8th Cir. 1975) (upholding a warrant on the basis that "people who own pistols generally keep them at home or on their persons"); United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am by The Charge
 - United States Constitution, Amendment 4 There is great consensus that the 1765 case of Entick v. [read post]