Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 281 - 300
of 16,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2020, 4:21 pm
The writing is crisp and clean.Though then, after discovering (on page 19) that the opinion was from Justice Bedsworth, I then got (at the end) to the page or two of amendments that were subsequently added to the opinion once the Court of Appeal granted the request to publish. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
But that was the prior appeal; thereafter, the California Supreme Court granted review and remanded the case for reconsideration based upon the Court's intervening decision in Franklin. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:34 am
But the trial judge granted a new trial, and the Court of Appeal held that although the jury's verdict might perhaps be reinstated, the Double Jeopardy Clause barred a new trial.The California Supreme Court reversed and remanded, unanimously holding that a new trial was permissible.Among other things, today's opinion shows just how troubling Supreme Court dicta can be. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
The California Supreme Court should grant review and make a final decision as to which position should prevail. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:36 pm
He pleaded no contest after the court gave an indicated sentence of a grant of probation conditioned on “60 days county jail to be served on the Weekend Work Program. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 2:27 pm
The California Supreme Court has granted review of a couple of those cases; indeed, briefing in the lead case started in 2019, and it is now fully briefed (as of June 2020) and simply awaiting oral argument and decision. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
This is yet another one of the plethora of published opinions that splits as to whether or not Dueñas was correctly decided and whether trial courts have to determine ability to pay before they grant restitution orders. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:14 pm
In each case the trial court granted defendant probation. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
It may not make rational sense, but people aren't uniformly rational animals.Case in point. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 1:36 pm
It takes real guts -- or stupidity -- to be a huge scammer and yet to file an appeal claiming that the FTC isn't allowed to make sure you don't scam additional people in the future. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 7:28 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
[cites to Doe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:49 am
Input/Output, Inc. et al v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
On January 7, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court remanded People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:46 pm
Property of the People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:20 am
Additionally, the Court ordered the defendant-appellant in People v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 1:23 am
On Friday, May 22, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied applications for leave to appeal in two cases, and vacated its previous order granting leave in People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
The preamble to the regulations made a reference to Robinson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:15 am
The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
