Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 281 - 300
of 381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
If that were true, the prosecution of E could send the wrong message to other young people being similarly exploited. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
This consternation is expressed in the first paragraph of the Supreme Court’s judgment in this case, given by Lady Hale and Lord Wilson, and most of the following paragraphs are given over to diluting the effect of the Grand Chamber’s decision. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
Law Lessons from Too Much Media, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
The families argued that Re McKerr had been rendered obsolete by the recent Strasbourg decision of Šilih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
TweetThe Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press has issued a news release about the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Too Much Media v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:56 am
In O’Grady v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
Feminist JurisprudenceKF2300.F46 2010Feminist judgments : from theory to practice / edited by Rosemary Hunter, Clare McGlynn and Erika Rackley [foreword by Brenda Hale].Oxford Portland, Or. : Hart, 2010. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
And they do not realize that because increasing numbers of these people are innocents, convi [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Lady Hale put the point another way: “if [people] do not have the right under [EU] law to move to reside [in the host Member State], then it is logical that that State should not have responsibility for ensuring their minimum level of subsistence” (para 103). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
., Hale v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:49 pm
The case is Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Moreover, he rejected Baroness Hale’s doubts in a recent House of Lords case that consent could truly be act specific. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Baroness Hale made clear that the question for the local authority (following on from Birmingham CC v Ali – our note here) is essentially about the future, ie the probability of the acts continuing in the future (“This is the limiting factor. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am
Although the judgement, given by Baroness Hale, did not mention human rights, it clearly impacts on article 8 rights to family life, and alongside the recent decision in Pinnock, could greatly increase the number of people to which local authorities are obliged to provide housing. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Summers v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Arbor alleged that the City had, without a vote of the people, effectively levied hidden taxes on its citizens through the excessive ch [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:07 am
Lord Hope and Lady Hale give the judgment of the Court. [read post]
