Search for: "People v. Haven" Results 281 - 300 of 2,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 6:37 am
I think I know why: When Justice Scalia brought it up (very inartfully) at the 2015 oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court holds that a Minnesota law that prohibits people from wearing political clothing in a polling place violates the First Amendment.The case is Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Though I haven’t kept a count, I know that there have been dozens of times when someone would tell me that because they were getting a tax refund they weren’t paying tax. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:33 am by By Amy Kates
The trial transcripts are a public record, but it's a record that many people haven't seen, so I think Lance Black is doing something important and very meaningful by making it accessible to more people. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:55 am by Michael Froomkin
I haven’t blogged about the Miami-Dade Mayor election because it’s mostly depressing. [read post]
  It looks like some Illinois courts are beginning to push back on the notion of many of my prosecuting friends and others who believe if you haven’t done anything wrong then there’s nothing wrong with letting an officer stop you.In People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:28 pm by Colin O'Keefe
If you haven’t noticed, the BP oil spill litigation is not going well for the energy giant. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:22 am by Tung Yin
 I had predicted that the finale would be Sharon v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 10:13 am by Steve Hall
Rather, this was an unfortunate case of Justice Kennedy the Court substituting its own judgment for that of the people. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:33 am by Sam Bray
Traditionally, injunctions have protected the plaintiff, but only the plaintiff — injunctions haven’t protected people who aren’t parties to the case. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
Furthermore, the trustees voluntarily adopted the word filters and haven’t committed to maintaining them in place, so they could change their minds and resume the censorship. [read post]