Search for: "People v. Lynch" Results 281 - 300 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
There are many exceptions, though, including one for people employed "in a bona fide ... professional capacity. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:26 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
He also strongly supported the Pullman Railroad Strike of 1894, led by Eugene V. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 7:51 pm
"(Makes you want to take a second look at his vote in Bush v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Lynch, et al., 2022 NLCA 29 (40302) Compensation for constructive expropriation. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Judge Lynch is not sure the plaintiff can win the case on the merits, but that's something for the trial court to worry about. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:51 am by Bill Otis
Lynch said point-blank at her confirmation hearing that she opposes the legalization of marijuana.Thus it would be not merely inconsistent with standing law (affirmed by the Supreme Court in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
If this spirit shall ever be so far debased as to tolerate a law not obligatory on the legislature, as well as on the people, the people will be prepared to tolerate any thing but liberty. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:46 pm by Mark Alexander
Supreme Court did not interpret the Constitution as providing relief for such matters, or even promoting equality, as seen in Plessy v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
The only two-time relist is Lynch v. [read post]