Search for: "People v. Market" Results 281 - 300 of 9,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm by David Gans
Sorrell involves a Vermont statute regulating marketing of drugs by pharmaceutical manufacturers. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
 In the decision of 9 July 2013 in BMS v Teva [2013] EWHC 1958, Mr Justice Birss assumed the role of the "remember when you..." parent in respect of Teva's launch plans. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:15 am by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
As a Schedule V drug, it will be classified as one of the least dangerous, least harmful and least addictive types of drugs on the market. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:03 pm by David Jacobson
In Australian Communications and Media Authority v FHT Travel Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 550 the Federal Court found that FHT Travel Pty Limited (FHT Travel) and its sole director Yvonne Earnshaw breached the Do Not Call Register Act 2006 by making, or causing to be made, more than 12,000 marketing calls in less than a month to people who had placed their telephone numbers on the Do Not Call Register. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm by Eric Goldman
In other words, people who try to cloak censorial regulations as pro-free speech are actually trampling on the Constitution. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:31 am
At least that is the view of realtor Engel & Völker and property specialists Lightstone. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 8:35 am by Michael Heise
In a bow to its market, the folks at Stata continue to tinker with Excel interfaces. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm by Ben Sperry
A traditional telephone company laid physical wires to create a network connecting people. [read post]