Search for: "People v. Martines"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,809
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Georgetown Law Professor Martin Lederman and I filed an amicus brief in California v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 11:34 pm
Martin, as an entry point into a discussion on the constitutional limits of criminalizing acts that occur in public because, in the words of Justice White in his concurrence in Powell v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in PGA Tour v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
The ICO has fined the Conservative Party for sending 51 marketing emails to people who did not want to receive them. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
The statement highlights the strong overlap between promoting and protecting competition in digital markets and safeguarding people’s data. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
European Parliament resolution of 20 May 2021 on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs (2021/2644(RSP))The European Parliament,– having regard to its previous resolutions and reports on the situation in China and EU-China relations, in particular those of 21 January 2021 on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong(1) and of 17 December 2020 on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region(2)… [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:28 am
Since the history-making case of Martin v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
Happy people just don’t shoot their husbands. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:58 am
No, the government can't require people who engage in speech with a specific sort of content (fact-checking) or who belong to a specific organization of writers (the International Fact-Checking Network) to register and provide a bond before speaking—just as the government can't require people who engage in speech with a specific sort of content to pay extra money for police protection (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
S v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
ASA published its Annual Report 2020 which highlights steps taken to make sure young and vulnerable people are protected from misleading, harmful or irresponsible ads. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 2:52 pm
EFF filed an amicus brief in the case, Martin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm
The new in Young v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:53 pm
See State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:53 pm
See State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:53 pm
See State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:35 am
A stark example: Martin v. [read post]
