Search for: "People v. Nixon" Results 281 - 300 of 625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
President Ford’s pardon of Nixon prevented the American people from seeing a former President go to jail. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:36 pm
Rather, H.R. 1586 really would tax the bonuses of people who worked for other TARP fund recipients, not just A.I.G. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
 But really, the most important feature here is that the police are conducting covert searches of people's homes. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am by jonathanturley
As I previously noted, it has been almost 50 years since the high court ruled presidents have absolute immunity from civil lawsuits in Nixon v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Jonathan Movroydis
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
He successfully argued New York Times v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:46 am
On Tuesday, the ACLU and ACLU of Alabama, alongside the Cato Institute and the Constitutional Accountability Center, filed an amicus brief in Gamble v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]