Search for: "People v. Novel"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 3:45 pm
The oral argument today in Evenwel v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:13 am
But the argument that baking a cake constitutes expressive activity protected under the First Amendment is quite novel. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:05 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Young v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:53 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
FBI v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 3:04 pm
Instead, ten factors from the Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Daubert v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:17 pm
Comment This is long and complex judgment which deals with a number of novel data protection issues. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Hence, the plaintiff in McRitchie v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:51 pm
[v] The third-party funding raises debate on its legitimacy and brings novel questions to be answered. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
In some ways the case reflects the problem posed by Parkes QC in Hodges v Naish. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:39 pm
NSA and Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:03 am
Instead of Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
To be novel a product obtained or obtainable by a process has to have some novel attribute conferred on it by the process as compared to the known product.ii) This rule is a rule of the law of novelty. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:58 am
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:58 am
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
: Excluding hyperlinks from the scope of the publication rule is an inadequate solution to the novel issues raised by the Internet. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said in a case that is one of first impression, this court is confronted with two novel questions: does the attorney confidential privilege survive the death of the client? [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Miller Bernstein LLP In Lavender v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 4:32 am
It says that a federal judge believes that lots of people find their use of language "sensible. [read post]
