Search for: "People v. Poole"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am
Earlier this summer, EFF filed an amicus brief in People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:44 pm
Russo and Espinoza v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:16 am
Poole, issued on July 21. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
For example, he argues that if a company chooses a mark like BABY SAFE for pool fencing, instead of say FENCE-A-POOL, the company can more likely register the mark without proving secondary meaning, since it's not directly descriptive of what the product really does. (26-27).I am not sure this is necessarily true. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:11 am
In Bearden v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
Trump v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
As a result, sample pooling is apparently less effective in areas with high infection rates. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:19 pm
In Weller v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
In Chapter 11 of the “Canadian Health Law Practice Manual,” Genetics and the Law, Amy Zarzeczny, Tracey M. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
Surrounded by very intelligent people, I have always learned something I needed to know. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:53 pm
As we argued in an amicus brief filed recently in People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:55 pm
On Title VII and employment discrimination: I have seen a remarkable amount of commentary in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in Bostock v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 12:06 pm
McCormick v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:07 pm
Beach Communications, Inc. (1993) (quoting Williamson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
The recent criminal case of R. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
In Sharufa v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 11:11 am
In Naruto v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:00 am
Büchel and the 5Pointz Michelangelos v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:48 pm
” Some U.S. commentators compared the case to Marbury v. [read post]
