Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 281 - 300
of 5,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2008, 6:50 pm
Amerisource Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Judge VanDyke has a point here.The question is whether the Cal Expo fairgrounds in Sacramento are a public forum sufficient to allow people to distribute First Amendment literature therein. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
Yeah, it's a hassle that some people drive in cans from Arizona to redeem them in California. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:32 pm
Accordingly, his claims are not properly preserved for appellate review under CPL 470.05, subd. 2 and based on the ruling in People v Cadorette. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:07 pm
In Bond v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
The same sex crimes was not charged in more than one of the counts (see People v Saunders, 290 AD2d 461 [2002]; People v Taylor, 190 Misc 2d 124 [2002]). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
As I noted in this post, on Tuesday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Kaley v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:44 am
People v Bailey, 330 Mich App 41, 944 NW2d 370 (2019). [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 8:55 am
People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:38 am
Her refusal to accept this suggests a lack of insight which renders it inappropriate for her to continue running a school. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:58 pm
From today’s Dejoria v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:48 am
Case citation: Solid Oak Sketches LLC v. 2K Games, Inc., 1:16-cv-00724-LTS-SDA (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:43 am
"Chalona v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm
In People v McClean, decided June 10th, the Court of Appeals held that, while right to counsel deprivations are normally reviewable even in the absence of an objection, the record must be clear that there was a deprivation, so a form of preservation requirement sneaks in through the back door. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Seventy-six people were aboard. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 8:58 am
People v Carter, 2007 NY Slip Op 3458, 2007 N.Y. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
"[T]rial counsel's duty of effective assistance includes the responsibility to advise the defendant concerning the exercise of [the] constitutional right" to testify at trial (Brown v Artuz, 124 F3d 73, 74, cert denied 522 US 1128; see People v Carpenter, 52 AD3d 729, lv denied 11 NY3d 830; People v Perry, 266 AD2d 151, 152, lv denied 95 NY2d 856). [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:56 am
Cir. 2013) and, thanks to a hung jury in the first trial, in United States v. [read post]
