Search for: "People v. Simmons"
Results 281 - 300
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am
Seven people have been hospitalized. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
Simmons struck down the death penalty for juveniles, citing the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Supreme Court to reconsider in light of Carey v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
(See Ford v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
For in Miller v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:48 pm
V. (2004). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
If Amazon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
They should be taken as a sign of our continuing commitment to the law-abiding people of Newburgh. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
They should be taken as a sign of our continuing commitment to the law-abiding people of Newburgh. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
Ashcroft v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:14 am
See also Periodic Tables by David V. [read post]
16 Nov 2005, 11:20 pm
(See Roper v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 11:47 pm
Simmons, which forced Perry to commute the death sentences of 28 prisoners who were younger than 18 at the time of their crime). [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Weems v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Weems v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
” And Simmons v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
But in constitutional or personal injury law, a disputant is likely to occupy only side of the "v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Having said that, however, the time and effort expended to date are sunk costs.[12] Granted, many people are not very good at ignoring sunk costs.[13] Ignoring sunk costs, however, is precisely what rational decision makers – including the ALI – ought to do.[14] The basic problem with the proposed Restatement of the Law of Corporate Governance is that corporate law is not a suitable subject for being restated. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
See, Simmons v. [read post]
