Search for: "People v. Smith"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
He was interviewed by reporter John Henry Smith. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:47 pm
People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266, 273 [2004]; People v Hines, 97 NY2d 56, 61-62 [2001]).People v Kolupa, __ NY3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 06586 [September 22, 2009].Would you want to be the attorney calling Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
That’s the rule that the Supreme Court correctly upheld in its free exercise case, Smith.Most people think an earlier Court case, Sherbert v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm
Posted by Ron SkolroodOn June 15, 2012, Madam Justice Lynn Smith of the British Columbia Supreme Court released her much anticipated reasons for judgment in Carter v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:18 am
Those were the facts in Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
The full 742 page, 2618 paragraph judgment, Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 41) [2023] FCA 555, was published on 5 June 2023. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
We therefore substitute our own discretion, " even in the absence of an abuse [of discretion],' " and we modify the order by determining that defendant is a level two risk (People v Smith, 30 AD3d 1070, 1071, quoting Matter of Von Bulow, 63 NY2d 221, 224; see People v Brewer, 63 AD3d 1604). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:39 am
See Pineda-Moreno v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
Hannum Conviction for Cyberstalking & Revenge Porn Survives First Amendment Challenge Contacting a Person’s Facebook Friends Isn’t Stalking–People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:42 pm
In Rizzuti v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:37 pm
The case – Riley v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:55 am
Lamar Smith, Karl Rove claims he had nothing to do with the prosecution of Don Siegelman. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm
(See also People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:20 pm
I think perhaps my last one – Smith v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:25 pm
Specifically, they refer to the case Johnston v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
The court found that the plain language of the statute required the AG to issue regulations before SORNA could be applied retroactively to people convicted of sex offenses before July 27, 2006. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003); and Rompilla v. [read post]
