Search for: "People v. Standard (1986)" Results 281 - 300 of 644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
Fraser (1986), the Court said a public high school student couldn’t use sexually explicit language at an assembly, while in Hazelwood v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
This morning, people in coffee houses and churches across the land will no doubt be talking about the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
If so, they may publish if they know they're protected by the "actual malice" standard, but refrain from publishing if they are subject to the negligence standard. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The ICWA and the federal regulations explicitly state that Awhere applicable State or other Federal law provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent or Indian custodian than the protection accorded under the Act, ICWA requires the State or Federal court to apply the higher State or Federal standard@ (25 CFR 23.106; see 25 USC ' 1921). [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin Russell
The opinion recites: Prior to her incarceration in 1986, Ms. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
However, all of the suspects were arrested (even those that passed the HGN), and 92% of them had a BAC of above the .10% standard used in Ohio. [read post]