Search for: "People v. Strain" Results 281 - 300 of 922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The Act provides immunities and defenses for legitimate “patients” and “caregivers”, but pecuniary schemes like the one at issue in this casenote are clearly not protected by the MMMA.Compassionate Apothecary, a medical marijuana dispensary, or “provisioning center”, was the business model that underwent recent scrutiny by the Michigan Supreme Court in People v McQueen. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 2:03 pm by Mark Tushnet
(I think he made that observation in connection with some arguments around Cohen v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:24 am by Eric
My marriage couldn't stand the strain of this lifestyle and ended in 2009, and while all of this was going on, my father was dying. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Lockett writhed and strained in agony on the gurney. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
  This issue was recently before the Court in the recently decided unreported (non-precedential) case of Saina v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:01 am by Joe Consumer
" Seems like a no-brainer, but unfortunately in 2004, when the court was the most consumer unfriendly, anti-environment, anti-victim, precedent-disregarding court in the land, it ruled in the Kreiner v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
" I remember that in the Plowshares v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:01 am by Joe Consumer
" Seems like a no-brainer, but unfortunately in 2004, when the court was the most consumer unfriendly, anti-environment, anti-victim, precedent-disregarding court in the land, it ruled in the Kreiner v. [read post]