Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Long)"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
[The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 3:46 pm
Side note—this all started so long ago that we still called the Civil Division “Superior Court. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:47 am
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 (1987). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Just last year, a federal district court in Texas affirmed that traditional view, ruling in Nyabwa v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
Long Family Land & Cattle Co., 491 F.3d 878 (8th Cir. 2007) — 491_f.3d_878 Attorney’s Process & Investigation Servs. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
On Wednesday the Supreme Court heard arguments in Hein v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:10 am
The bill was a knee jerk reaction by the legislature who were unhappy with a number of more recent court decisions liberally allowing for palimony claims including the ruling in Devaney v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 11:51 am
Superior Court (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 1564, 1574.) [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:38 am
From McClendon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 10:02 am
USA LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am
Even so, Scalia did not live long enough to join in the rolling back of a key human and constitutional right. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:08 am
In our view, ‘the reasons that originally led’ other courts to adopt ‘the rule have long since disappeared. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
" Harris v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:19 am
Superior Court --Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
A challenge to the provisions was successful in the Ontario Superior Court; however, that decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Superior Court, 149 Cal. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
