Search for: "Perry v. Littles " Results 281 - 300 of 455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm by Ashby Jones
Buckle your seatbelts, LBers, for what will undoubtedly be the highest-profile Supreme Court case since a little dustup in 2000 called Bush v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:57 am by Steve Hall
Perry, it was just another day out of state on the campaign trail. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 10:44 am by Lovechilde
Under a Supreme Court decision called Printz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
Colb In my Justia Verdict column for this week, I discuss the case of Perry v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
That’s the question the Supreme Court is going to have to answer next term in Perry v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by Laurence Tribe
  And when it appears before them, whether it is styled Perry v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:55 am by Eoin Daly
More recently, in Van Orden v Perry [2005], a narrow conservative majority of the Supreme Court held that the display of the ten commandments on the grounds of the Texas state capitol did not violate the establishment clause, primarily on the basis of the historical, secular significance of the Ten Commandments in the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:50 pm by Buce
  Will Governor Perry avow that he will carry his analysis to its logical conclusion, and commit that a Perry administration will prosecute tax evasion as treason--with, I should think, the death penalty, and to satisfy originalists everywhere, I suppose the death penalty in whatever  ugly and disgusting form was prevalent during the time of Henry V? [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:48 pm
 Thus, I think that a Court decision rejecting a same-sex marriage right would have little impact on the 2012 race. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by David Ward
(Anything by Earle Stanley Gardner (Perry Mason); his stories were part of the reason I became a lawyer. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by cornellvermontlaw
While a narrow reading of the Article 4  suggests that only Civil War debts must be paid, in Perry v. [read post]