Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 281 - 300 of 8,539
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Gregory Bacon (Bristows)
Multiple parallel cases This was an interesting feature of the Ocado v AutoStore litigation. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:18 am by Chloe Dickson (Bristows)
On 25 October 2023, HHJ Hacon (sitting as a High Court Judge), rendered his judgment in Philip Morris v Nicoventures[1]. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 9:52 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Peter Mavrick is a Miami business litigation attorney, and represents clients in Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, and Palm  Beach. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am by centerforartlaw
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
According to WRAL, Peter Gabaree was asked to leave a popular bar in the college town. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In what appears ended up as a pro-se breach of fiduciary duty law suit, in Pacelli v Peter L. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:13 am by INFORRM
In fact, the European Court of Human Rights first used the term ‘SLAPP’ only as recently as 2022 in OOO Memo v Russia. [read post]