Search for: "Peters v. Doe" Results 281 - 300 of 3,544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
The State does not direct us to any law carving out an exception to the Confrontation Clause that applies here. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:27 pm
 The commenter wanted to draw our attention to  Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec Ltd [2008] EWHC 2127 (Pat), a recent Patents Court judgment by the ever-eloquent Peter Prescott QC (this Kat remembers his judgment in the matter of CFPH's applications being an unusually good read).The case relates to a contractual dispute relating to patent and 'know-how' licensing, rather than to patents directly. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
The Background The pursuer, Mr Campbell, was employed as an apprentice joiner by Peter Gordon Joiners Ltd. [read post]
Apple’s own Statement on FRAND Licensing of SEPs stipulates that a willing licensee is not merely considered unwilling if ‘it refuses arbitration, challenges the merits, or resorts to litigation because the SEP owner does not offer FRAND terms. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:02 am
Applying the public policy exception in a judicial review arbitration awardsMatter of Amalgamated Transit Union v MTA Bus Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 30877(U), April 16, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 115102/08, Judge: O. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:52 pm
Yates v Yates, 259 Ga. 131, Moore v Moore, 249 Ga. 27 (1982), Lowery v Lowery, 262 Ga 20 (1992), and Peters v Peters, 248 Ga. 4980 (1981). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm by richbailey
Supreme Court began hearing arguments Wednesday in Golan v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:47 pm
I'm late catching up with Peter Moskos' Washington Post story in which he offers up some gee-whiz numbers on the use of drugs in the US v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
On 2 June 2016 the CJEU came down with its long awaited judgment in Nabiel Peter Bogendorff von Wolfersdorff v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:21 am
ParrisCitation: 2009 WY 44Docket Number: S-08-0247; S-08-0248Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County, the Honorable Peter G. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Similarly, a lender who takes a mortgage to a property subject to a void deed does not have anything to mortgage, so the lender’s mortgage is invalid as well (Cruz v Cruz, 37 AD3d 754 [2d Dept 2007]; Yin Wu v Wu, 288 AD2d 104, 105 [1st Dept 2001]). [read post]