Search for: "Petition of Blake"
Results 281 - 289
of 289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2006, 6:12 am
But, stare decisis didn't stop the SCOTUS from reaching and deciding Apprendi , Ring, and Blakely. [read post]
13 Oct 2005, 7:06 pm
Or is the petit-grand larceny example just an accident? [read post]
6 Oct 2005, 8:17 pm
[Update: Here is the link to the Jaramillo cert. petition.] [read post]
26 Aug 2004, 9:12 am
Certification to file a second or successive petition could not be granted unless the Supreme Court had held that Blakely applied retroactively to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2004, 9:45 am
Petitions for rehearing are not necessary and the court will notify counsel if supplemental briefing is desired.The Mooney panel had upheld the conviction, but divided over whether Blakely applied to the federal sentencing guidelines. [read post]
6 Aug 2004, 10:58 am
In that regard, the parties will have until 14 days following the Supreme Court's decision to file supplemental petitions for rehearing in light of Booker/Fanfan. [read post]
2 Aug 2004, 7:26 am
in Penaranda, as well as the petition for rehearing in Blakely v. [read post]
28 Jul 2004, 12:35 pm
" "In support of certiorari in this case, the government argues only that the Blakely question is important. [read post]
27 Jul 2004, 12:29 pm
In the meantime, Washington State has filed before the Supreme Court a petition for rehearing of Blakely itself, see petition here at Blakely Blog, arguing that the majority in Apprendi was wrong as to the historical underpinnings for the decision (and these were simply adopted without questioning in Blakely). [read post]
