Search for: "Philadelphia v. Price" Results 281 - 300 of 332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm by Alden Abbott
It may be assumed that today’s Supreme Court (which has deemed consumer welfare to be the lodestone of antitrust enforcement since Reiter v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Ralph Oman, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Washington, D.C., as amicus. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
They asked the Delaware Chancery Court to review the “entire fairness” of the transaction, per Kahn v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
The dispute went on to the Third Circuit Court, based in Philadelphia. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),EU: Counterfeit medicines in the EU: a new consultation: (Class 46)Thailand US Trade Representative to ‘talk’ to Thai government: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), US: Cellectis SA files suit against Precision BioSciences, alleging infringement of two patents relating to materials used to make genome modifications in certain types of organisms: (IP Law360), US: PharmaBiotech IP Summit 28-30 May, Philadelphia will address… [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:58 am
But in a surprise move Tuesday, attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies, who opposed each other in Bush v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am by Monica Bay
And congrats to the Philadelphia Phillies, well-deserved champions of the National League, for a tough battle. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Though she gives no citation so that one can determine which Supreme Court case she wants to highlight, she surely is referring to Quill Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Aurora rejected that offer, and an attorney in Hall’slaw office proposed a sale price of $425,000, which would have meant a loss to thelender of about $340,000.It is undisputed that on June 18, 2009, Aurora recorded a notice of default.The notice of default used this (obviously form) language: “The Beneficiary or itsdesignated agent declares that it has contacted the borrower, tried with due diligence tocontact the borrower as required by California Civil Code section 2923.5, or… [read post]