Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 281 - 300 of 3,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2025, 4:27 am
 Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Arnold and Phillips and Lady Justice Falk)  Thatchers Cider Company Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 5 (20 Jan 2025)This was an appeal by Thatchers Cider Company Ltd. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:29 pm
On April 21, 2009, the North Carolina Court of Appeals overturned a monetary ruling made by a lower court in the workers' compensation case of Crawford v Phillips. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:28 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Strong feelings question A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Phillip Mason of second-degree murder and related offenses in 2015. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:21 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mitchell, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1899 (08 September 2009) Burns, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1907 (03 September 2009) Truong, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1910 (01 September 2009) Atkins & Anor v R [2009] EWCA Crim 1876 (02 October 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Phillips & Anor v McGregor-Paterson [2009] EWHC 2385 (Ch) (02 [...] [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm by Guest Author
Today’s Neo-Brandeisians may have abandoned components of Brandeis’s antitrust program—namely, his commitment to “fair trade” and his distrust of big government—perhaps placing them in closer alliance to Judge Learned Hand’s antitrust logic in U.S. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:06 pm by Liskow & Lewis
By Andrew Wooley On May 8, 2015, the Supreme Court of Texas held in Phillips v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:06 pm by Liskow & Lewis
By Andrew Wooley On May 8, 2015, the Supreme Court of Texas held in Phillips v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:42 am by Eric Goldman
Phillips also argued that the unilateral amendment right made the contract illusory, an argument that succeeded in the Harris v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:15 am by Jonathan Stroud
There were also 10 denials of institution, nine of which were on Section 314 non-merits grounds; the FitBit filings against Phillips patents were denied institution over Fintiv based on an International Trade Commission (ITC) action Phillips initiated, and a number of parallel petitions filed by Comcast were denied consideration under the Board’s July 2019 Trial Practice Guide Update “ranking” requirement (which was itself based on an earlier Comcast v. [read post]