Search for: "Pictures Words, Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 1,289
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
If the purposes of the Restatement Project is to paint an accurate picture of where the law currently is, and where it is going, quantification is at least implicit. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
GuestKat Cecilia Sbrolli writes Seal the deal: Canadian court waxes off copyright infringement in Pyrrha Design Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In puffery discussions, courts often say that vagueness matters: some words or statements are too vague to have one specific meaning. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:00 pm by The CGCP Team
China Law Connect (Issue 4) cover and The Tidings of Spring |《中国法律连接》(第4期)封面与《春讯》This newsletter covers: Six Belt & Road Guiding Cases and AmCham Talk The CGCP’s Global Impact China Law Connect (Issue 4): Judicial Mediation, Regulating AI, and AI and Courts A Grant from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation & How to Purchase China Law… [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1998), analogous. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:18 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Curiously, there was no discussion of the Virginia Supreme Court case of Allen & Rocks, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The term “emoji” comes from the Japanese words “e” (絵, or “picture”) and “moji” (文字, or “character”), so emoji literally means “picture character. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am by Eric Goldman
  By regulation, those classes of works are (i) motion pictures; (ii) sound recordings; (iii) musical compositions; (iv) literary works being prepared for publication in book form; (v) computer programs (including videogames); and (vi) advertising or marketing photos. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:08 am by Kevin
So, I hate to say it, but it looks like the rat will remain. 1 V for Vendetta (the motion picture) is ©2006 Warner Bros Pictures, Inc., subject to what appear to be numerous assignments of various rights that I’m not going to research further because this is classic fair use and therefore not infringing, which is kind of the whole point. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:33 am
Mad Engine, Inc. the defendant marketed t-shirts designed with the word ‘DAD’ in the famous DC Superman logo. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Guild Mortgage presented testimony from its CEO to the following : Guild [Mortgage] has never received any communication from Guild Investment Management, Inc., or from any third party contending that Guild’s use of its mark has infringed upon Guild Investment Management Inc’s mark, or has caused confusion with regard to any other business which uses or incorporates the word “Guild” in its mark, in any way. [read post]