Search for: "Pike v. State"
Results 281 - 293
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:02 pm
Applying the Pike test, the Court first pointed out that, after years of discovery, no disparate impact on out-of-state, as opposed to in-state businesses, could be found regarding the ordinances. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:33 pm
The plurality (in a section not joined by Justice Scalia) then goes on to hold that the trash ordinances survive the test outlined in Pike v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:13 am
Scott v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 1:32 am
There is a bit of this involved in NTP v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 4:01 pm
Charney v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:15 pm
Drew v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
" In Pike, the Court allowed a five-level guideline increase based only on proof by a preponderance, citing to a pre-Booker case (Riley) in which the defendant agreed that the preponderance standard applied. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 11:20 am
Pike, No. 05-30528 (1-17-07). [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 3:58 pm
If they do so, and do not favor anyone either in- or out-of-state, they should be judged under the Pike balancing test. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:27 am
Instead, a more lenient test that balances burdens against public benefits, as articulated in Pike v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 6:01 am
Furthermore, a Pike v. [read post]
