Search for: "Pooler v State"
Results 281 - 300
of 307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
Under the test set forth in Henry v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:49 am
by Brian Wolfman In Estate of Pew v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:20 am
The district court said there is no hostile work environment case, dismissing the complaint.The Court of Appeals (Pooler, Lohier and Lynch) reverses, issuing a far-reaching decision. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 6:54 am
Here is what the Court of Appeals (Katzmann, Pooler and Lynch) did:1. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 9:27 am
, the Court of Appeals (Pooler, Katzmann and Preska [D.J.] says. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:48 am
The Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Dotson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:42 am
The district court found the village liable under the Fair Housing Act for intentional discrimination, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is MHANY Management v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:02 am
Pooler, Barrington D. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:54 am
The Second Circuit (Parker, Pooler and Lohier) says, "Supervisor Lootens stated that “profitability expectations” became greater in 2006 and 2007, and that a more 'organized' worker would be better, but Lootens does not explain why O’Reilly was able to meet the previous profitability goals but not the new goals. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
And second, remember that there is a large segment of the membership of the DCBA that has never seen the inside of a State courtroom. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:47 am
The state prison system had a treatment program for this, but defendant Dr. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Judge Rosemary Pooler joined the majority. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:32 pm
Freeport Pancake House, Inc., August 7, 2015, Pooler, R.). [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:39 am
Supreme Court case construing the act, Sosa v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:59 pm
Pooler, Robert D. [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:44 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Mukasey, No. 05-4448 Petition for review of a decision denying petitioner asylum and related relief, and finding that he was removable due to a prior state conviction for possession of a controlled substance, is denied where a remand was unnecessary because petitioner's challenge to the state court conviction constituted an impermissible collateral attack, and he presented no other claims that would entitle him to relief. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
Feb. 2, 2012) (Pooler, J. concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:48 am
The appeals court, however, affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of the employee’s claims against several private equity investors (Guippone v BH S&B Holdings LLC, December 10, 2013, Pooler, R). [read post]
