Search for: "Powers v. Planned Parenthood"
Results 281 - 300
of 434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
On the legal side, several Supreme Court justices engaged in a lengthy discussion of this question in 1992, when they considered the precedential status of Roe in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 10:12 am
Earnest and profound questions regarding “the mystery of human life” (Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
Framing the issue so bluntly may invite dispute from some who will cite the Court’s departure from expectations at key past moments, especially the Court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] Can a state immunize its agencies from federal antitrust law through judicial review?
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
Planned Parenthood of Houston & Se. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
And you chose a devout Catholic as your running mate.But if you really were reflexively pandering to the Catholic bishops, I don’t think Cecile Richards of Planned Parenthood would have been the featured speaker she was on this night. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:56 am
Some commentators who agree with the result are likely to view yesterday’s decision as a straightforward application of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
As Greenhouse puts it:The dry, almost clinical tone could scarcely be more different from the meditative mood the Supreme Court struck the last time it stood up for abortion rights, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm
Benson, 285 U.S. 22, 60 (1932)); see also Planned Parenthood Ariz., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
” Breyer doesn’t play it too coy, announcing pretty quickly that these requirements “are not consistent with the constitutional standards set forth” in the Court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
When the Supreme Court announced its decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
That’s what she did when whistleblowers released video evidence of Planned Parenthood officials discussing the sale of body parts. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 3:30 am
Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
Planned Parenthood (1992) (plurality opinion) (employing an “undue burden” test in the context of the fundamental liberty interest in procuring an abortion because “the State’s interest in the potential life within the woman” justifies certain regulations). ] Lawrence is not to the contrary. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:23 am
Wade -- Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm
Notably, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 10:51 am
Wade (and nominating Supreme Court justices committed to doing so) and defund Planned Parenthood. [read post]
