Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 281 - 300
of 18,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2020, 4:36 pm
(“AFIN” or the “Company”), formerly known as American Realty Capital Trust V, Inc., listed its shares on Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”), under the symbol AFIN effective July 19, 2018. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm
The price of a little piracy can be rather steep, as proved in a recent California case. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
See Krumme v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 6:41 am
v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:34 am
Huff Fund Investment Partnership v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:43 pm
” Association for Accessible Medicines v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm
Perfect price discrimination is only theoretically possible since the seller must know each buyer’s reservation price (the maximum they will pay) and individualize an offer to them at that price, thus not leaving any potential revenues uncaptured. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
I have no opinion about whether the price-gouging claim is valid. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
Price appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
In Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
In Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
In Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
In Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
In Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
In Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:45 am
CMA v Flynn Pharma and Pfizer: Intel’s Influence Evident as Court of Appeal Clarifies ‘Excessive Pricing’ Test (UK) James Killick, Assimakis Komninos, Aqeel Kadri In December 2016, the CMA found that both Pfizer and Flynn had abused their respective dominant... [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:39 pm
The allegation that certain large consumers, by receiving a rebate, effectively paid a lower rate than the complaining customers did not transform the action into an attack on filed rates.The June 4 decision is Willams v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 5:02 am
Anderson v. [read post]
