Search for: "Price v. State ex rel. Price" Results 281 - 300 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
Note that this is a relatively rare direct appeal from a three-judge district court because it is a congressional redistricting case; more on that later. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  We wonder how much fun the feds had in their negotiations with the whistleblowers in the qui tam case of U.S. ex. rel. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:33 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) April 5, 2019David Olson (@PIEBCLaw): How can patentees use licenses to price discriminate under current exhaustion law post-Impression v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:38 am by Yolanda Young
Sweatt’s petition, together with two other law school cases—Missouri ex rel. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm by Sasha Volokh
City of Richmond, 226 U.S. 137, 143–44 (1912); see also Washington ex rel. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 8:46 am by Zak Gowen
” The ruling arose in the context of an opt-out follow-on class action against five shipping companies that the European Commission found had engaged in a cartel to fix the prices of deep-sea carriage of new cars (McLaren v MOL and others). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Referring to counter-terrorism cases and relevant public protocols in the UK, his presentation demonstrated the complexity of state secrets, the supervision of security intelligence agencies, and the tension between human rights and national security. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:51 am by Michael A. Nesteroff
This summer’s decision, however, by Northern District of California Judge Claudia Wilken in California ex rel. [read post]