Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue"
Results 281 - 300
of 837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2012, 7:18 pm
The most important part of the Chief Justice’s analysis is the list of six factors set out to assist the Court in determining on which side of this test a particular transaction falls: “participation in investment”, duration of existence of holding structure (prior to acquisition), period of business operations in India, generation of taxable revenues in India, timing of exit and continuity of business on exit. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
Later today, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 06-376, Hinck v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
§ 1450, the Court has authority to revisit, modify, and dissolve state court orders entered prior to removal. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:50 pm
The case is Severstal v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:12 am
Justice Breyer asks about the Department of Justice's theory of standing. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In her January 31, 2014 decision in Morille-Hinds v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
Indiana Dept. of State Revenue - The Department of State Revenue denied a taxpayer's claim for a refund of gross retail taxes paid on utilities provided to its guest rooms. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Most recently, in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
Hall J., in Schuster v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am
Montana Department of Revenue. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am
Montana Department of Revenue, holding that Montana’s exclusion of religious schools from a state-funded scholarship program for private schools violated the First Amendment, “parents will have more options when it comes to directing their kids’ education—whether at secular or religious schools. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:42 pm
See Dep’t of Revenue of Montana v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
As he wrote in his dissent in Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
The policy required prior authorization by a regional manager and later by the marketing department. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the necessary mechanisms to ensure compliance with the White v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
Family Court dismissed the Petitioners prior petition seeking to establish paternity of the child. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 12:03 pm
Unlike Part 200 and prior funding programs (i.e., BTOP), the duration of the Federal Interest would not depend on the useful life of the asset. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others… [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:33 am
Last week the Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
