Search for: "Proper v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 22,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
As an additional penalty, the court required that Appellant pay restitution in the amount of $955.Although no objection was made to the restitution order and notwithstanding Appellant immediately, at the sentencing hearing, paid the restitution, Appellant now complains that the order constitutes an illegal sentence because (1) the recipient was neither a victim nor a proper restitution payee, and (2) no evidence was introduced regarding the amount of restitution.Referring to Chaney… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:55 am
See Aravena v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:49 am
(See Ryan v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
In SNC-Lavalin America Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:16 am
The post Case Preview: R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport & Anor appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 5:27 am
State Sen. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 2:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
[1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Bond v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:10 pm
Connecticut State Employees Retirement Commission (Whether determination by State Employees Retirement Commission concerning date on which disability retirement benefits become payable was proper). [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:02 pm
State Urban Dev. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:09 am
In Anselma Crossing v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:07 am
Stewart v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
The same constitutional challenge was made in 2014 in State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:37 am
The case is styled, Sara Esteban v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 4:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 7:41 am
State Baldwin v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:31 pm
Here is the abstract: In the recently decided United States v. [read post]
