Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent"
Results 281 - 300
of 354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The district court found the case barred by the Feres doctrine, which provides that "the Government is not liable ... for injuries to servicemen where the injuries arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Skavdahl, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Respondent): Gregory L. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:05 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, you'll notice that although the state Attorneys General succeeded in having the Health Care Act’s individual mandate declared unconstitutional, it wasn’t their arguments that ruled the day. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, is the matter filed on behalf of 26 states, the NFIB, and a handful of individual plaintiffs. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:12 am
Thereafter, relying almost exclusively upon proof that it elicited, Family Court ordered that respondent be placed with the Office of Children and Family Services until August 31, 2011. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Family Court placed the children in the temporary custody of the Department of Social Services and ordered an investigation into respondent's allegations. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
Read as a whole, Munby LJ said that the guidance to Crown Prosecutors required them to take into account the interests and welfare of the Defendant, the interests and welfare of the victim(s), the impact of a prosecution on the mental, physical and emotional health of the victim, the views of the victim or the victim’s family on these matters, and the views of social services. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant): Supreme Court refers humanitarian protection appeal rights question to Court of Justice of European Union. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
Therefore, following R(M) v Hammersmith, and as Children's Services had not had any contact with TG, the accommodation provided by the housing department could not be classed as being under s.20 Children Act. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
Therefore, following R(M) v Hammersmith, and as Children's Services had not had any contact with TG, the accommodation provided by the housing department could not be classed as being under s.20 Children Act. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
Department of State, Washington, DC 20520; phone: 202-736-7000, FAX: 202-647-2835.) [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
DENNIS HANEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:05 pm
The respondent referred to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Campbell and Fell v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm
In July, the Justice Department responded. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Such efforts have been undertaken in the recognition that ordinary market place for legal services fails to provide such services to significant segments of the population and to significant interests. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
It should also be noted that this author wrote an amicus brief in the case on behalf of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute.Mental Health RecordsThe issue presented in the Superior Court case of Gormley v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
SMITH, IV, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
ARMIGER, Appellant, v. [read post]
