Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of State"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2015, 9:35 am
Similar to the fact pattern in Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 11:19 am
Nonetheless, the state retains a legitimate concern in ensuring that some individuals’ unruly assertion of their rights of free expression does not imperil other citizens’ rights of free association and discussion. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:56 am
In Miami-Dade County v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:13 am
” The dispute before the court in Carson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:42 am
This reprimand "is a textbook example of adverse action," the district court states, citing Phillips v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:39 am
Posted by David UrbanPerhaps because California citizens have become more interested in local politics in recent years, public agencies have received a marked increase in the number of requests for information under the California Public Records Act. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 6:34 am
Public employee or citizen? [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:51 pm
Based on the facts in the complaitn, the Second Circuit held that (1) the fire inspector's speech was of public interest, (2) in making such statements, he was not acting as a fire inspector but as a private citizen and (3) as a result of his actions, he suffered from adverse job inspections. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
From People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:55 pm
The First District certified conflict and certified the following to the state supreme court as a question of great public importance: Whether, in light of the supreme court’s ruling in Department of Education v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
” (Citing Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
(An amicus brief from Public Citizen urges the D.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 6:03 pm
iStock From Thursday’s Bridgeville Rifle & Pistol Club v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Attorney's Off., 2018 NY Slip Op 00895, Appellate Division, First Department, a public officer may be entitled to claim absolute immunity as a defendant in a lawsuit under certain circumstances. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:22 pm
” The Court reiterated that formulation just six years ago (in Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:13 am
Wild Horse Campaign v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
In Hubbert v. [read post]
