Search for: "Public Defender of the State of Delaware"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2015, 4:22 pm
It now appears that other states also are no longer willing to approve these kinds of settlements. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:45 am
Public Policy The Court ruled that "Delaware does not have an overarching public policy that prevents the stockholders of Delaware corporations from agreeing to exclusive foreign jurisdiction of any matter involving the internal affairs of such entities. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 pm
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
Charges against a fourth defendant, Austin Alcala, 19, of McCordsville, Indiana, remain pending. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:30 pm
Although Miles worked for NuVasive in California, the company is a Delaware corporation and Miles’s employment contract specified that it was governed by Delaware law. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 1:29 pm
(Delaware holds the distiction of the first state to ratify the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Chiappinelli’s article How Delaware’s Corporate Law Monopoly Was Nearly Destroyed, was cited in the following article: Kiran Nasir Gore, Delaware as a Next Generation Hub for International Arbitration Practice: Building the Case for the First State, Beaumontm Flouchard & Brodlija, International Commercial Arbitration: Quo Vadis? [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:13 am
The difference from patent law is that the substantive single publication rule for defamation means that the nationwide damages all stemmed from the same tortious act that led to the specific personal jurisdiction in NH; in the patent context sales in one state that might create personal jurisdiction in that state are separate acts of infringement than sales in another state. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 11:26 am
The Ohio State University, Michael E. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 4:21 am
” The complaint asserts that the pre-filing requirement is “so onerous” that it “effectively guarantees that, notwithstanding the provisions of state and federal law, no class or derivative action can be filed against Defendants, no matter how egregious their conduct may be. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
The Moelis Decision The Company, an investment bank, went public through an initial public offering. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:28 am
He explained that, in his view, "neither Delaware case law, nor Delaware public policy, favors the exception to Delaware’s contra proferentem doctrine set forth by the majority. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:14 pm
In the meantime, if you know of significant Delaware eDiscovery cases from 2005 or the first half of 2006 that you think I should have included, please post a comment to let everyone know. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 12:09 pm
The court also discussed the rules of interpretation for deciding disputes involving provisions of bylaws, as well as the strong public policy in Delaware for defending the unimpeded shareholder franchise which in most cases means the right to vote for board members at annual meetings and includes the option of proposing directors if so desired. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:32 am
Defendant DaimlerChrysler Aktiengesellschaft (“Daimler”) is a German public stock company that manufactures Mercedes-Benz vehicles in Germany. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 12:12 pm
Although it has long been common practice in the United States for the defendants to bear the burden of all legal fees if they lose, plaintiffs have never been required to pay the legal expenses for their defendants. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 10:41 am
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware law and writing about it in various publications for over 30 years. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:28 am
The defendants appealed. [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:45 am
During the May 7 forum, several panelists noted that non-binding proposals have no legal standing under the corporate laws of Delaware and other states. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 10:35 am
He questioned how witnesses could be cross-examined in a telecast and said it raised questions of due process.Morawetz interrupted Adler to defend the joint hearings, but his words were mostly inaudible in the Delaware courtroom. [read post]
